大麻提取方法比较：哪种输液适合您？

从经典的大麻布料到现代真空低温烹调法，每种大麻提取方法都有独特的优势。 本指南比较了所有主要方法，以帮助您选择适合您需求的方法。

快速回答

最好的大麻提取方法取决于您的优先事项：黄油最适合烘焙，椰子油用于多功能性，用于美味菜肴的橄榄油，快速发作的酊剂和精度的真空低温烹调法。 所有方法首先需要脱羧以激活 THC。

---

提取方法概述

脂肪基输液

• 黄油（大麻）: 烘焙的经典选择
• 椰子油：饱和脂肪含量最高，用途最广
• Olive Oil：心脏健康，美味的应用
• MCT Oil：吸收快，室温下液体

酒精提取物

• 酊剂（常清）: 快速舌下吸收
• QWET（快速洗涤）：浓缩，更清洁的味道

精确的方法

• Sous Vide：实验室级一致性
• 专用机器: 魔法黄油，热心新星

---

方法对比图

---

大麻：经典

Best For

• 巧克力蛋糕，饼干，蛋糕
• 需要黄油的传统食谱
• 丰富、放纵的烘焙食品

Pros

• 面包师熟悉的成分
• 丰富的风味与甜点相得益彰
• 广泛记录的食谱

Cons

• 不是素食主义者/无乳制品
• 保质期较短（冷藏2-3个月）
• 鲜明的黄油味道

Efficiency

70-80% THC 提取正确的技术。

Verdict

选择黄油 if you primarily bake and prefer classic recipes. The gold standard for cannabis brownies and cookies.

---

椰子油：最通用

Best For

• 胶囊和药丸
• 烘焙和烹饪
• 皮肤应用
• 万能输液

Pros

• 最高饱和脂肪（82%），可获得出色的萃取
• 纯素食和无乳制品
• 保质期长（6-12个月）
• 精制时的中性风味
• 可用于主题

Cons

• 凝固在 76°F 以下
• 如果使用未经精制的椰子味

Efficiency

80-85% THC 提取 - 石油方法中的最高。

Verdict

选择椰子油 if you want one infusion that works for everything. Best single-method choice for beginners.

---

橄榄油：心脏健康

Best For

• 沙拉酱
• 地中海烹饪
• 面食完成
• 面包浸渍

Pros

• 健康的脂肪
• 纯素食和无乳制品
• 独特的风味增强了美味的菜肴
• 无需冷藏

Cons

• 浓郁的橄榄味不适合所有食谱
• 降低烟点限制烹饪应用
• 比椰子油更低的提取效率

Efficiency

75-80% THC 萃取。

Verdict

选择橄榄油 if you cook savory dishes and value health benefits. Perfect for cannabis chefs focused on Mediterranean cuisine.

---

酊剂：最快的表演

Best For

• 舌下剂量
• 精确测量
• 谨慎消费
• 长期存储

Pros

• 快速发作（15-30分钟舌下）
• 极其精确的剂量
• 多年的保质期
• 紧凑便携
• 没有卡路里

Cons

• 酒精味/烧伤
• 2-6周准备时间
• 需要高强度酒精

Efficiency

85-95% THC 萃取 - 所有方法中最高的。

Verdict

选择酊剂 if you prioritize fast onset, precise dosing, or need long storage. Ideal for medicinal users.

---

真空视频： 最大精度

Best For

• 一致批次
• 气味控制环境
• 科学的方法
• 经验丰富的大麻厨师

Pros

• 实验室级温度精度
• 几乎没有气味
• 高度一致的结果
• 无需监控
• 出色的提取效率

Cons

• 需要专门的设备（80-200美元）
• 真空低温烹调法的学习曲线
• 更复杂的设置

Efficiency

85-95% THC extraction due to precise temperature control.

Verdict

Choose sous vide if you value consistency and discretion. Worth the investment for serious cannabis cooks.

---

Honey: Sweet Infusion

Best For

• Tea and hot beverages
• Natural remedies
• Toast and breakfast items
• Sweet applications

Pros

• Natural sweetener
• Long shelf life
• Soothing for throat/cough
• Unique application

Cons

• Low fat content = lower extraction
• Requires lecithin for best results
• Longer infusion time (6-8 hours)

Efficiency

50-70% THC extraction (improved significantly with lecithin).

Verdict

Choose honey as a specialty infusion for teas and sweet applications. Not ideal as your only extraction method.

---

Specialized Machines

Magical Butter Machine

Price: ~$175

Pros: Automated, consistent, built-in heating and grinding

Cons: Expensive, still produces odor

Ardent Nova/FX

Price: ~$250-350

Pros: Decarbs and infuses, very precise, odor-controlled

Cons: Most expensive option

LEVO II

Price: ~$250

Pros: Modern design, app control, good odor management

Cons: Smaller batch sizes

Verdict

Choose machines if you make infusions regularly and value automation. Higher upfront cost saves time over many batches.

---

Choosing Based on Your Priorities

If you want the strongest infusion:

1. Tincture (Everclear)

2. Sous vide coconut oil

3. Stovetop coconut oil

If you want the easiest method:

1. Stovetop cannabutter

2. Slow cooker coconut oil

3. Specialized machine

If discretion/odor control is priority:

1. Sous vide (sealed bags)

2. Specialized machines with covers

3. Tincture (minimal heating)

If you are on a budget:

1. Stovetop methods (no special equipment)

2. Mason jar in slow cooker

3. Oven decarb + stovetop infusion

If you primarily bake desserts:

1. Cannabutter

2. Coconut oil

3. Honey (for specific recipes)

If you cook savory meals:

1. Olive oil

2. Coconut oil

3. Cannabis concentrate added to dishes

---

Combining Methods

Recommended Approach

Keep multiple infusions on hand:

• Coconut oil: General purpose
• Butter: Baking specific recipes
• Olive oil: Salads and savory
• Tincture: Fast relief when needed

Cross-Compatibility

Any infusion can technically be used in any recipe with adjustments, but matching method to dish produces best results.

---

Extraction Efficiency Explained

What Affects Efficiency

• Fat type: Higher saturated fat = better binding
• Temperature: Optimal range 160-185°F
• Time: Longer = more extraction (to a point)
• Agitation: Stirring improves contact
• Decarboxylation: Proper decarb is essential

Typical Efficiency Ranges

• 50-60%: Poor technique or wrong method
• 70-80%: Standard stovetop with good technique
• 80-90%: Optimal conditions or sous vide
• 90-95%: Extended time, precise temp, tinctures

---

Match your extraction method to your cooking style and priorities. There is no single best method - only the best method for your needs.